Question: In Which Of The Following Ways Are Content And Face Validity Similar?

In which ways are content and face validity similar?

Face validity considers how suitable the content of a test seems to be on the surface. It’s similar to content validity, but face validity is a more informal and subjective assessment.

Which of these is a similarity between content validity and face validity?

Identify a similarity between content validity and face validity. Both focus on assessing whether the content of a measure reflects the meaning of the construct being measured. However, exercise also correlates with good health, which is also a measure of physical fitness.

What do face validity and content validity have in common quizlet?

What do face validity and content validity have in common? They both are subjective ways to assess validity. Some relevant behavior or outcome.

Why are convergent validity and discriminant validity often evaluated together?

Why are convergent and discriminant validity often evaluated together? *Both terms mean the same thing. * Both involve collecting information from a lot of psychological measures of theoretical interest. If a measure is valid, it is also reliable.

You might be interested:  How To Create Content In Word?

What is an example of content validity?

the extent to which a test measures a representative sample of the subject matter or behavior under investigation. For example, if a test is designed to survey arithmetic skills at a third-grade level, content validity indicates how well it represents the range of arithmetic operations possible at that level.

What is an example of face validity?

A test in which most people would agree that the test items appear to measure what the test is intended to measure would have strong face validity. For example, a mathematical test consisting of problems in which the test taker has to add and subtract numbers may be considered to have strong face validity.

What are the two types of validity?

Concurrent validity and predictive validity are the two types of criterion-related validity. Concurrent validity involves measurements that are administered at the same time, while predictive validity involves one measurement predicting future performance on another.

What are the factors that affect validity?

Here are some factors which affect internal validity:

  • Subject variability.
  • Size of subject population.
  • Time given for the data collection or experimental treatment.
  • History.
  • Attrition.
  • Maturation.
  • Instrument/task sensitivity.

What is face and content validation?

Face validity assesses whether the test “looks valid” to the examinees who take it, the administrative personnel who decide on its use, and other technically untrained observers. In clinical settings, content validity refers to the correspondence between test items and the symptom content of a syndrome.

Which of the following is a correct description of validity?

Validity can be defined as the agreement between a test score or measure and the quality it is believed to measure.

You might be interested:  Question: What Is Silica Content?

What is discriminant validity in psychology?

the degree to which a test or measure diverges from (i.e., does not correlate with) another measure whose underlying construct is conceptually unrelated to it.

What is a construct validity in research?

Construct validity is the extent to which the measure ‘behaves’ in a way consistent with theoretical hypotheses and represents how well scores on the instrument are indicative of the theoretical construct.

What is an example of discriminant validity?

A determination along the latter lines is referred to as discriminant validity (de Vet et al., 2011; Streiner et al., 2015). For example, a performance-based measure of walking should be positively correlated with self-reported ability to walk a block.

What is another word for discriminant validity?

The term “ divergent validity” is sometimes used as a synonym for discriminant validity and has even been used by some well-known writers in the measurement field (e.g., Nunnally & Bernstein, 1994) although it is not the commonly accepted term.

What is the difference between convergent validity and discriminant validity?

Convergent validity takes two measures that are supposed to be measuring the same construct and shows that they are related. Conversely, discriminant validity shows that two measures that are not supposed to be related are in fact, unrelated. Both types of validity are a requirement for excellent construct validity.